OJ Simpson: The Hidden Tapes…….a crock of……….

Source: OJ Simpson: The Hidden Tapes…….a crock of……….

OJ Simpson: The Hidden Tapes……a crock of…..

Once again, we were enticed into viewing a full crock of hot smoldering donkey doo doo with the latest Simpson offering, and its slight of hand tricks.  I understand this is the year that we are to be bombarded by several more Simpson oddities based upon the one sided hearsay that people have long considered to be the truth in this matter.  However, what it is, is an odorous clump of unsubstantiated crap that investigative journalists would have found had they done an iota’s worth of due diligence.

Unless you were born in 1996, we’re all aware of those so called Hidden Simpson tapes, and have been told about them and what was on them for the last 19 years.   You told us years ago, what was said and what Simpson’s alleged demeanor was, so when presented for a couple of hours the show then becomes boring to us who’ve been around for awhile. It certainly did not deliver the shocking umph! to me that your trailers imply, unless you were just recently weened from a baby bottle.

However, the fascinating suspicion begins to build immediately, for me, not towards O.J. Simpson but when immediately hit with the images of the same old players, Fred and Kim Goldman, whining about their inability to get a court awarded $33 million dollars from Simpson while crying about the loss of their alleged love one, Ron Goldman.

If you read the depositions of Fred and Kim you might get another impression of how deep their love actually was, and whether all of the crying is simply feigned alligator tears from money hungry grifters.  Ron apparently liked to get amnesia when it was time to repay money he owed that he’d borrowed from family members, and it caused anger and hostility towards him.   This may have also been a reason behind his death as well, but not with family debt but with debts owed to outsiders based on allegations of drug involvement near the Cheviot Hills Tennis Courts where he was the tennis instructor.

Some unknown woman that is said to have been a writer with a New York Newspaper named Caruso, goes on and on in the program, about Fred Goldman, telling us, at least “he had a day job”, like telling us that was worth a gold star.  However, the mystery has always been where was he employed, what kind of job did he have, and for how long.   Now, this should not mean much to anyone except that it might just mean something significant in the whole scheme of things that led up to these murders in the first place.  Something that is never discussed is Fred’s background.  After investigators talked with his step-son, Brian Glass, now a lawyer back in the region of the country from which the Goldman’s all hail, the Chicago Metro area, we find that the image of Fred does not stand up.

Brian talks about him with such vitriol as being a brutalizing domestic abuser himself who beat his Glass step children by his present wife, Patti Glass, now Patti Goldman.   He even alleges that Fred punched him in the face and knocked him down a flight of stairs while Brian was on crutches, resulting in Patti moving the children out of she and Fred’s home, in Los Angeles, California for a time.  Given what we now know about Brian’s father, a little something-something, that Fred has neglected to tell us, beating up on that man’s children was not a brilliant thing to do.   In fact, marrying this man’s former wife was a questionable thing to do as well 7 months after he entered federal prison.  You see, Brian Glass’s father was Marvin Glass, a federally charged Illinois drug king pin, and gangster-lawyer, with his own crew of leg breakers and killers, as well as a man with severe psychological problems himself.  Not only did Marvin Glass face 210 years in prison for conspiring to distribute narcotics around the country, but he was tried as well for attempted murder, for allegedly having his partner shot in the head.

According to pre-trial medical doctors Glass suffered from the same mental disease that military doctors diagnosed with the Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein, before executing him; malignant narcissism.   A malignant narcissist has the bad habit of taking minuscule things personally, and believing many things, even those which are minor that arguably aren’t theirs belongs to them, maybe like their children by their ex-spouse; you think?

  

While Fred mentions the man in his book that he reads during the program, “His name is Ron”, he adroitly avoided mentioning this man’s name over eight times in the book, and even lies about his professional status at the time of the book’s release.  Calling Glass a retired Defense Lawyer, is laughable, given the magnitude of the fugitive chase all over the news papers during the mid-80s and the trial that led to his final conviction.  Glass was disbarred from practicing law when he was sent to prison, by then afflicted with terminal HIV from a blood transfusion he received in Florida purportedly after being struck while fleeing by a vehicle on a Florida highway, he would later die in 1998.  However, Brian Glass reported that when the children reported on Fred’s abuse when visiting him in prison, he was not a happy camper regarding Fred’s conduct.  This man, who had cross country tentacles, would not have to reach out too far, because Fred at least does bother to tell us in his book, that the dangerous and duplicitous, ex-convict, Glass was in Los Angeles at the time of Ron Goldman’s death and in close proximity to the rest of the family.  He had received an early release for cooperating with federal authorities as a confidential informant in one of the most significant federal operations in Illinois history, to bring down bribe taking judges who Glass had considerable connections.  The federal sting was called “Operation Grey Lord” and brought down even a celebrated appellate judge, Otto Kerner, of the famously named John F. Kennedy appointed Kerner Commission.

And then there is old slick talking Daniel Petrocelli, white haired and slimmer now than the younger fat jowled fast talking slickster of around 1999-2000, who comically was seen scurrying away from a microphone at the downtown superior courthouse, when Dr. Henry Johnson of the OMIG investigative  group approached the microphone to dispute and challenge the accepted lies that have now become the mortar of the Simpson case.  Given his now slimmer physique he shouldn’t have a problem getting away much quicker now.

 

Noticeably, Petrocelli loved to use the word liar over and over again in denigrating Simpson.  I suspect his hair has turned pure white now, staying up stressing about who is going to catch him up in his own lies like FOX NEW’S Shepard Smith did in 2000, when OMIG investigators were pursuing the Juditha Brown telephone records that originally excluded Simpson from being the murderer of the two victims.  Those records stated by both the mother and father of Nicole Brown Simpson had the mother Juditha on the phone with Nicole at 11 PM on the night of the murders.  Behind closed doors the lawyers would argue until reaching an unholy alliance that the phone call would change to 10:17 PM, and ultimately seven months later during the trial on February 07, 1995 to 9:37 PM.  Can you believe that?  How hard is it to see a telephone record, that should be part of the public record?  At least that is what Petrocelli told FOX NEWS before their millions of viewers, in fact he attempted to down play their significance and tell everyone “They’re public record, everyone could see them, and you could have seen them too, had you asked me I would have brought them with me”.  Fox Told Petrocelli we’ll have our producers contact you after the show and we’ll arrange to get those records to display them to the viewing audience.   Then Smith would report two days later that Petrocelli outside of camera range now, had now lied, and reneged on his commitment.  He would not give FOX a copy of the phone records that he two days prior said anyone could see, since they were the property of the Browns.

 

The question I always wondered about was whether Petrocelli even saw the records himself, since he accepted a proffered stipulation to them by Daniel Leonard, one of Simpson’s civil attorneys, during the civil trial of 9:37 PM.  Thus, Petrocelli did the same as Marcia Clark and Johnnie Cochran during the criminal trial regarding those vital phone records.  Although the time that Nicole was last known to be alive talking on the telephone had changed three times from 11PM, to 10:17 PM, to 9:37 PM, causing arguably a question of authenticity that was now in conflict, it should have been an exclusive matter for the jury under the rules of common law.   However, they conveniently circumvented the jury’s examination and have never been seen as a certified record by the public although subpoenaed from GTE Telephone Company as People’s Exhibit 35.  Those records were being pursued because they were surreptitiously removed from the Simpson case file on April 24, 1998 with a secretive motion for court order for their permanent removal along with all of the other evidence in the Simpson case file by the lead prosecutor in the Simpson criminal trial, William Hodgeman, and granted by another questionable judge’s action , Judge John H. Reid, who’d go on to issue other questionable orders relative to concealing evidence regarding the serial killer Glen Rogers that was potentially related to the Simpson case.

                                  (L) Asst D.A., (then Deputy D.A. Bill Hodgeman) and (R) Judge John H. Reid

The Alleged Bruno Magli Shoe Question…..And their uncertainty.

 

(L) OJ Simpson in alleged Bruno Magli shoes photo seen in his 1997 civil trial and (R) FBI Special Agent William Bodziak who determined that the shoes in 1994 were Bruno Magli found at the murder site.

Dan Petrocelli and his associate minions go on and on, about alleged size 12 Bruno Magli shoes, that showed up in photos in 1997 in time for Simpson’s civil trial.  However, what makes the photos of Simpson in these alleged Bruno Magli shoes suspicious is that they didn’t they show up in 1994 when they were allegedly found or by 1995 when the FBI Special Agent, who found them, William Bodziak, was first presenting them at trial on the witness stand as being veritable evidence that they were the Bruno Magli brand of shoes.

Well, down below is Simpson’s foot traced into a tracing of the size 12, or actually size 46, SILGA U2887 Rubber shoe sole which was attached to the bottom of the Bruno Magli shoes that they want to place Simpson’s feet in.  However, we have several problems with them doing that starting with the size of Simpson’s foot, seen in green in the photo on the right side below, and along side the size 12 SILGA black rubber sole on the left.  One can see that Simpson’s green foot given to us by Dr. Henry Johnson’s investigative team, OMIG, indicates a foot allegedly belonging to Simpson that extends outside of the U2887 Size 12 SILGA (Bruno Magli) shoe sole.  Even though we qualify it with the words alleged.  We’ve examined the size 46/size 12 U2887 shoe sole, and we have shaken the massively long hands of Simpson which are much larger than the average size man’s hands, and are symmetrically proportioned with his feet.  So if anyone wants to offer us a one-to-one bet, we’ll take the position that Simpson’s foot is accurately portrayed in the green photo tracing and does not fit into the size 12 Bruno Magli shoe with the SILGA U2887 sole attached.  For such an expensive shoe, it certainly presents an image of a very uncomfortable and visually unbecoming shoe in regard to its fit.

 

This could have been resolved by Agent Bodziak simply going to the central jail in Los Angeles County and measuring the exact dimensions of OJ’s foot but his arrogance of presumption is his excuse during testimony of not doing so, and confirming such an important fact in this so called “trial of the century”.  So the question now becomes did Bodziak simply inadvertently fail to determine the trustworthiness of the evidence that he was presented, or did he intentionally jeopardize the preeminent integrity of the FBI’s name and image.  Given the fact that the FBI had previously been involved in a scandal of this magnitude 23 years earlier in Los Angeles, albeit not televised at the time, they may have made a critical decision to secretly gamble and back Bodziak in order to save their name and reputation from past years embarrassment.

I cannot imagine their being pleased with Mr. Bodziak’s actions of placing their persona in jeopardy with the public, however, they may have been forced to get in bed with him until this matter calmed down and hopefully evaporated.  However, with OMIG investigators nothing it seems ever calms down for them to stop looking at the irregularities in the Simpson case.

 

You see in the immediate photos above, in both the one on the left and the one on the right, with the SILGA size 12 U2887 shoe sole held in Bodziak’s hand, the location in the middle of the shoe in front of the heel, is the identification plug for the brand of shoe.  SILGA left an empty space in its shoe soles so that the brand’s identification plug could be placed inside that hole.  These soles were shipped like that with an empty space to whatever company to which it sold this shoe sole from its U2887 rubber mold.   Notice that the heel of the shoe is raised, so that it also raises the area where the identity plug is located off of the ground as well, which you can see in the prints made by the shoe sole on the left.  This style of shoe sole was not only sold to Bruno Magli for its brand of shoes carrying the U2887 SILGA shoe sole, but SILGA sold the shoe sole to another company that owned 20 various brands of shoes beyond the nation of Italy where Bruno Magli was manufactured.   This is according to the words of the special agent, Mr. Bodziak, himself.  Unfortunately, he would not elaborate on it during the actual Simpson criminal trial in 1995, but would do so in a re-edited 1999 second edition of his 1981 college text book.  FOOTWEAR IMPRESSION EVIDENCE, Detection, Recovery, and Examination.

Thus, we have a problem with Special Agent Bodziak’s method of arriving at his empirical conclusion, which was right on the money as far as  others, like Petrocelli, have concluded.  He and others would have you believe by 1997, that these were in fact Bruno Magli shoes in a picture of OJ Simpson wearing them that had not been photo manipulated, even though it was disclosed during the civil trial that the all important negatives of Simpson allegedly wearing these shoes had by 1997 traveled outside of the U.S. to a European destination whose intelligence agency was noted for fraudulent photo manipulation. However, we can only conclude that maybe the cost was estimated for attempting to flim flam the public and certain people in decision making positions determined that it was a price they were willing to pay after Bodziak had left the Simpson trial witness stand.

It is our position that due to the design of the raised heel of SILGA’s U2887 sole, it was no way for Special Agent Bodziak to determine that the shoe prints in the photo were made by Bruno Magli or 20 other global brands in 1994 or 1995.  So, the question that we, who are not convinced of Mr. Bodziak’s clairvoyant skills,  is how did he objectively determine that these shoes were Bruno Magli shoes?   We know that based upon the demonstrations shown us at OMIG’s office, they certainly don’t believe it, and until Bodziak provides a prudent explanation, I’m afraid I don’t believe him either.  Furthermore, it is unimaginable to us that any prudent professional representing the FBI, would publicly place the integrity of the brand of the most preeminent investigative agency in the world on the line in a 20-to-1 gamble.  To do so, with the back up of assuming that the only persons wearing such shoe soles where people who bought them from the 299 pair of Bruno Maglis owned by the North American distributor, was purely reckless.   The brand itself is not identified in any of the bloody shoe print photos taken at the Bundy Murder site due to the raised heel, thus Bodziak in our opinion was engaging in a shell game with the integrity of the FBI put on the line.

.

Until the American public is presented a full exposure to the truth behind the Simpson case, they will continue to be misinformed and misled.  They shall continue to be taken for fools via the use of duplicitous actions on the part of sworn officers of the court utilizing the media in a one sided manner to continue presenting a lie, based upon a false narrative regarding OJ Simpson.  This man was used as a guinea pig to see how far they could go with duping the American public for their own clandestine pecuniary interests.

I suspect that Daniel Petrocelli’s hair is going to get much whiter than it is now, worrying about whether this alleged on-going lie is going to catch up to him.  Though he may appear to look better than the bloated fat boy face of the 90s he displayed, our suspicion is that Petrocelli is losing weight behind those hidden lies in hope that they are never exposed.  That’s what makes these people dangerous, because they have engaged in activity that potentially foments danger for all on both sides of this matter, and what makes this whole affair a crock full of excruciatingly awful smelling %^#*.

Black Lives No-longer Mattered at the End of the OJ Simpson Trial

Black Lives No-longer Mattered at the End of the OJ Simpson Trial.

Hidden Revelations in OJ Simpson Case almost derailed by loose lips…………………….Big B takes a hard look.

The author of two extraordinary  books on the concealed revelations about the OJ Simpson murder case of 1994-95, PURSUIT OF EXHIBIT 35 In the OJ Simpson Murder Trial and THE PEOPLE VS. OJ SIMPSON and a 2004 documentary as well, entitled SERPENTS RISING: The OJ Simpson Conspiracy, http://www.serpentsrising.com, T.H. Johnson, corresponded with us this week to apologize about something that he did, that we gave little thought about, which apparently matters to him.  It is regarding a comment he made relative to one of those old advertisements

         about Aunt Jemima, that bigbiggityben writers blogged about previously under one of our other alter egos regarding the historic use of black images in the marketplace, despite the contradictory assumptions.   Aunt Jemima became the prominent image of the plantation mistress of the master’s kitchen whose buttermilk pancakes pleased the palate of the master in the big house. ala Hattie McDaniel’s character in Gone with The Wind, as well as pleasing the rest of our taste buds over the last century.  She had a certain authority.

    The photo of Aunt Jemima in an unusual pose standing in the midst of two Southern white gentlemen and a white woman, talking and smiling probably about her delicious pancakes, while conveying an image that all is happy with blacks and whites in what arguably was the most tyrannical period in American history for blacks of the antebellum era, before the Civil War, in the South.  A time when white folks owning plantations became filthy rich off the free sweat equity of slave labor which they valued as chattel property and who had contributed to making the cotton plantation owners of Mississippi some of the wealthiest individuals in the world by 1836.   This unrelated image momentarily incited Johnson to publicly opine on what he considered the disingenuous expression promoted in the photo by exclaiming that the white woman was probably stating “Now you see gentlemen, antie promises she’ll make us some of those delicious pancakes of hers and won’t poison us”. 

 This  remark appeared to ruffle the feathers of some of Johnson’s white allies in the Simpson investigation.  Though Johnson explained that he did not intend for it to be taken in the literal sense, but as an image of deception that is in existence even today, and engaged in generally  by the power structure in  today’s contemporary times and not just towards blacks, he stated.  Unfortunately, for him, his white associates particularly from the south did take it personal, and assumed that Johnson really felt that way, and that apparently disingenuous people should be dealt with.   One ally that Johnson wanted to make amends with was Joyce Spizer-Foy, a Texan, author and former private investigator who became the intermediary between Johnson and the organization for which he was an investigative team leader called OMIG, (Ocean Medical Investigative Group) out of Los Angeles, California.   Johnson and his crew, in 1999 was in the midst of investigating the cover up in the Simpson case of crucial information and evidence that they believe would have undoubtedly exonerated OJ Simpson as the murderer of his wife, Nicole and her friend, Ron Goldman, and obviated the need for a trial which we know as that incomparable spectacle the media dubbed as “the trial of the century” ( PURSUIT OF EXHIBIT 35).  He and his staff discovered a continuing common thread of  alleged malfeasance by court officers.   In this case, that would become subsequently associated with an investigation Spizer was doing as well, OMIG investigators initially found that a single unknown judge, relative to the Simpson case, who is now retired, Judge John H. Reid, had been sought on three different occasions they found by other sworn court officers of Los Angeles County to aid in the removal

Retired Judge John H. Reid

of all evidence in the Simpson case file by using his authority to either remove or seal certain controversial documents that could have had a different impact on the public that what was sold to them by the media, aided by misleading information.  The permanent removal of all of the evidence in the Simpson case file was by a secretive application, in an ex parte motion filed with Judge Reid by the lead prosecutor in the Simpson trial, William Hodgman.

Now L.A, County Assistant District Attorney William Hodgman

That elusive evidence (Exhibit 35) are the telephone records of Juditha and Louis Brown, Nicole Brown Simpson’s parents, for the date of 06/12/94 that was entered by stipulation and never presented to the jury, resulting in the circumvention of the jury’s examination with entry by stipulation.  The actual document that came forth five years later in December of 1999, under pressure appears to be a fraudulent document.  In other words, the telephone records they wanted to agree to on both sides came in by behind closed door agreement, that ultimately changed the time 3 times from the initial 11PM time stated by both the mother and father of Nicoles as to the last time she was known to be alive, on two separate occasions.  The time went from 11PM, to an offer behind closed doors of 10:17 PM, found in a court transcript of a conversation in a preliminary hearing judge’s chambers, to the now officially recorded during trial by mutually accepted stipulation of 9:37 PM.  The latter time would have made it impossible for the Brown family to drive home in time from Brentwood, to their home in Dana Point, Orange County to make that call.   The drive in 1994 due to major HOV lane construction was approximately a two hour drive with the official traffic volumes for that evening.  An approximate 8:45 PM departure from Brentwood would not have allowed the Browns the travel time to accomplish the prosecution’s objective of a stipulated 9:37 PM phone call.

Juditha and Louis Brown, parents of Nicole Brown Simpson

That is just one of the unusual things that OMIG investigators believe is a smoking gun implicating prosecutors and defense lawyers, as well, in obstruction of justice.  However, in Johnson’s act of attrition this week in 2015 to keep the peace among his alliances, he had to do his own homework in political correctness, something Donald Trump might want to take note after this week’s debacle during his first Republican debate.  Johnson had to realize that geographic differences matter in considering the feelings of all of those who have aligned themselves with the side he’s on, relative to the Simpson concealment. Where it concerns Spizer, is that the same judge was used over and over again, to seal certain mitigating evidence related to her subject client that would have favored Simpson, and undermined the prosecutors’ case against him.   Some of that information would be published after Spizer and Johnson met in January of 2001, in the hotel lobby of the Ontario Airport Hilton Hotel, in Ontario, California.   She met with him and another OMIG investigator to hold discussion regarding evidence, approximately half way between Los Angeles and Palm Desert, California, where Spizer and another traveler who drove with her called home.  They were directed to meet each other by a Florida convict that Johnson had traced to death row in a prison in Raiford, Florida, a man by the name of Glen Rogers.

It turns out that Johnson had found that the same judge who had abetted the surreptitious removal of the Brown’s telephone records from the Simpson case file, John Reid, was the same judge who sealed crucial records on this man, Rogers, as well as crucial information from a prosecutor who was responsible for arranging to bring Rogers back to California to stand trial for murder,  now retired L.A. County Deputy D.A. Lea D’Agostino.  Everyone in Gil Garcetti, the L.A. County D.A., ignored the possibility of Rogers leaving death row to stand trial else where, that usually does not occur, and is only done generally as a political favor by one Governor requesting special dispensation from another Governor, normal extradition procedures don’t work in the instance of someone sentenced to death row.  Usually the only way they come off is in a casket after execution has been carried out.  So, the woman they like to call the “Dragon Lady” pulled it off, certainly to the nervous political dismay of Gil Garcetti and his inner circle.  The reason they would not have wanted him returning to Los Angeles is because of allegations, including those brought to their attention by their Deputy D.A. D’Agostino, herself, that Rogers had been in a proximate relationship with Simpson’s ex-wife Nicole. D’Agostino was dismissed rather crudely by deputy D.A.’s from Garcetti’s office, who emptied her desk and demanding she turn over all notes and documents related to Rogers.  Their formal reason for her demotion was that she was not qualified to handle the prosecution of a high profile case.  However, according to Johnson, her documents indicated that she was a noted prosecutor with very high marks based on her annual proficiency ratings.  Others stated that she was enormously better than Marcia Clark, then why the dismissal from the Rogers case.  D’Agostino protested to the Civil Service Commission in a grievance hearing, and it appears that whatever redacted information she had to say about the Rogers connection was so damaging that Judge Reid was asked again to seal the transcript of that proceeding as well.

Lea DAgostino order by judge John Reid sealing greivance in People v. Glen Rogers BA109525

.

Johnson talks about what he found in his book THE PEOPLE VS. OJ SIMPSON, as well as PURSUIT OF EXHIBIT 35 In the OJ Simpson Murder Trial where after years of research and attaining documents, he and investigators found that Rogers was afflicted with a congenital psychotic disease all of whose symptoms are psychiatric, and have the lethal effect of turning him into a uncontrollable beast through little or no fault of his own, he has had the disease since childhood.  More perplexing was that women he was with probably could not see the transformation coming because Rogers was described as being a ruggedly handsome fellow, and a gentleman on the surface.   However, the disease for which Rogers is afflicted, is diagnosed as being notably triggered by one thing for sure, alcohol consumption.  In the case of 4 women, three of which were killed within 2 weeks time, Rogers was noted as being in a location where he had been consuming alcohol.

    

Convicted serial killer Glen Edward Rogers, and a monster he becomes from a spontaneous attack of the dreaded A.I.P. or  Mad King George’s Disease.

The disease Johnson noted, was found first buried in his California death row appeal file, sealed by the same judge, John H. Reid, who allowed the permanent removal of all evidence in the Simpson case file.  He would not find out it had been sealed until 3 hours after examining and making notes of the contents within the Rogers file when admonished by a senior clerk that all of the files he had been given were confidential because of an identifying stamp 187.   The replacement file he was given held nothing of interest on Rogers.  Before the senior clerk came and took it away, he noticed that the Rogers file had repetitive notes by medical doctors in pre-trial medical reports regarding the disease he has and appeared to be the writing of several doctors attempting to cover themselves from malpractice in the event of some controversy regarding this virtually silent high profile trial.  When T.H. Johnson brought his investigative notes back to the office of the Ocean Medical Investigative Group, he sat down with his brother, and chairman, Dr. Henry S. Johnson, and other medical doctors who heard about the disease but knew very little beyond its name Porphyria.  As time went on in 2000, and the OMIG investigator dug deeper into the concealed documents and his communiques with Rogers on death row; who had been secretly shipped back to death row in Florida after his California murder conviction in 1999, Rogers began to open up.   Johnson told Rogers that what he read was not about the skin ailments associated with porphyria, and its allergic reaction to sunlight, but the type of porphyria that impacted the brain exclusively.  Rogers seemed surprised and did not know anything beyond the word porphyria, and that only a few doctors knew of his disease in the various institutions he was incarcerated as a teenager.   The disease is said to have been the premise for the two classic horror pictures, “The Wolfman and Ann Rice’s Dracula” a being so deformed they cannot stand to be out during the light of day, and one who roams as a beast during the dark hours.   By this time, Johnson had been in contact with the specialists of this disease from the American Porphyria Foundation, as well as European medical specialists in the disease.  He was now convinced that Rogers was not afflicted with the strain of porphyria that causes skin and appendage deformities, but he was afflicted with the acute form of the disease, Acute Intermittent Porphyria or A.I.P, whose spontaneous conveyance of an over production of an iron enriched enzyme called heme, goes straight to the brain with severe toxic effects.  The afflicted can often experience a spontaneous bipolar reaction, which could catch an acquaintance off guard with other spontaneous psychotic reactions of paranoia, schizophrenia, hallucinations, and delirium, and could become uncontrollably violent and dangerous to whomever was in close proximity.   The common name for the affliction A.I.P.  became Mad King George’s Disease, named after a British Monarch, George III, who was a late 18th century monarch during the time of the American Revolution.  King George III would ultimately have to be locked behind bars for the last 10 years of his life until he died in 1820 for his safety and the safety of others.

King George III, suffered from the affliction of Acute Intermittent Porphyria later to be called in reference to the monarch Mad King George’s Disease.  He would die behind locked cell doors in Windsor Castle after 10 years there 1810 to 182o.

Rogers put the OMIG investigators in touch with his Florida public defender, who provided additional documents from his murder trial in Hillsboro County, Tampa, Florida. Those documents indicate that the medical specialists who were called to testify in the sentencing phase of Rogers’ trial fully testified that he suffers from all of the indications of the most acute form of porphyria, that which is called MAD KING GEORGE’S DISEASE  or AIP.   This raises further questions as to whether Rogers had been afforded proper due process, in both Florida and California.  Thus, if he suffered from the disease AIP and was afflicted with it at the time he committed these murders he would, and should have, possibly been determined to be mentally unfit to stand trial, rather than tried and convicted of murder.  It appears that by concealing this information which we now know that California had as well, they may be attempting to use Florida as a surrogate to execute Rogers, which would assure his silence in the Simpson matter.   A secure mental asylum for sure should be his final residence for life, but not death row, as Johnson believes despite the number of people he’s killed and estimated to be around 100.   Rogers began to open up more and more, based upon what he could remember.  However, he also has problems with his memory as the California doctors noted because of the severe trauma to the brain he’s experienced over time.   Working undercover for law enforcement, as a confidential informant, we sure he had to prove his loyalty and mettle.  They noted he’d been struck with tire irons, beer bottles, baseball bats and even hit by a car that has, they’ve determined, damaged the frontal lobe of his brain.   The California abstract below for Rogers’ transfer to San Quentin state prison’s death row, indicates the California court officials knew Rogers was afflicted with this insidious psychiatric disease, but attempt to discount its severity as a psychotic disease by referring to it as simply porphyria with no explanation of what it is or its psychotic effects that impair the mind of the afflicted.  The record indicates that D’Agostino was told to not expect that Rogers would be allowed to file his appeals from a prison cell in California because they were determined to send him back to Florida’s death row once his Los Angeles trial had ended.

Glen Rogers Pophyria acknowledgement before CA Court certification for death sentence

Johnson is now busily making calls to make amends and keep the loyalty of his or OMIG’s growing caste of relevant supporters together, who have something substantive to offer and which continues to grow each week.

The most recent and important connection, is a Denver author named Stephen Singular who wrote about a neo-Nazi organization, called the Order, and their execution of a Denver radio talk show host, Alan Berg, back in 1986.   Singular was contacted by an LAPD insider because of that book, Talked to Death, who ultimately met with Singular in a Denver park to tell him that there was also a neo-Nazi connection within the LAPD, in the first week of August 1994.  The insider particularly cited those in command positions willing to protect corrupt police officers on the force, and when they retired they retired as veteran officers to the same geographic region of NE Washington, NW Idaho, which is the central head quarters of the Aryan resistance groups, skin heads, and neo-Nazi organizations.   At the same time the insider was in Denver, another Deputy D.A. by the name of Lucienne Coleman was fielding complaints from other officers about LA Detective Mark Fuhrman for parading around the precinct on weekends wearing Nazi paraphernalia, and the continued animosity shown a fellow officer for marrying a Jewish woman.  The allegations were claimed by author Joseph Bosco, A PROBLEM OF EVIDENCE, to be true that Fuhrman’s fingerprints were found on a Nazi swastika placed in another officer’s locker by internal affairs.

 Because of what Singular was told and brought to the attention of both defense lawyers and prosecutors 8 months before the trial began and less than two months after the murders occurred, it shook up both sides, prosecution and defense, who apparently did not want the revelations of Singular brought to light.   Singular appeared to know and describe everything related to the planted glove, and planted blood containing what neither side knew anything about at the time; EDTA.  It was Singular told them about it and he got a Colorado blood specialist to explain how to conduct the delicate test for the blood preservative EDTA.    Although one of the prominent prosecutors in the Simpson case was going to show everyone one that Singular was a charlatan, and run him out of town on a rail, by sending the blood samples off to the FBI laboratory.  However, when the results came back the prosecutors gambit failed, the FBI special agent had to admit that the tests found the blood preservative EDTA was in the blood, high enough according to the Denver blood specialist to be fatal if found in a human body.  This was an indication the blood was indeed planted.

What that insider described at Simpson’s residence concerning the glove and a stick used to carry it onto his property, would be found, and photographed by police photographers at Simpson’s Rockingham residence, indicating what the anonymous insider said was right about a visit to plant evidence on Simpson’s property two times during the dark A.M. hours of Monday 06/13/94.  Our advice, keep scurrying  OMIG and Mr. T, this Simpson saga won’t go away and just keeps getting more interesting every day….

The Importance of Hulk Hogan’s use of the N-word.

Here again, the use of the N-word exposes what many blacks consider to be the true internal feelings that whites in the United States have for others who are black, even though they have done nothing harmful to them, nor acted with disrepute towards them; but simply on the basis of some deep seeded ignorant taboo that many whites, particularly white men, have adopted over the centuries regarding people of color, and particularly African Americans interacting intimately with their family members.     The revelations of the wrestler Hulk Hogan’s heretofore, unknown, natural repugnance regarding blacks simply drags the integrity of other whites into suspicion whose true intent may be to act with integrity towards blacks.  Why is the Hulk’s revelations so important?  Because Hulk Hogan is a legend in pop culture which is the only thing that appears to matter these days and is where the general population of our nation predominantly ascertain its alleged knowledge of facts to draw conclusions, no matter how lopsided or warped those conclusions may be.   Hogan is not the first, and undoubtedly won’t be the last to reinforce a mindset of distrust for whites because of the revealed utterances of these pop culture icons.  The same thing occurred not long ago with another TV icon, and pop culture favorite, the bounty hunter, Dwayne “The Dog” Chapman.

The Dog, it appears, was irate because his son was in an intimate relationship allegedly with an African American woman, and his son taped his racially charged rant using the N-word.   Then came in the aftermath what to me appears always to be some type of disingenuous apology to save the economic ship from sinking.

No matter what you think of the entertainment genre itself, Hulk Hogan was a prime factor in building the popularity of the brand, of the professional wrestling organization WWF, World Wrestling Federation, which was ultimately changed to WWE due to an infringement on the usage of the letters of the trademark WWF owned by the World Wildlife Federation that apparently claimed use of the abbreviation long before Vince McMahon, Jr’s family used it for their wrestling enterprise.

The Hulkster even attempts to mitigate the gravity of his offense towards an unknown person, who is an alleged son of a black billionaire, due to his intimate relationship with Hogan’s daughter, by bringing up what one of his old nemesis in the ring, Booker T, had to say in one of the publicity seeking hype sessions they do on air during a weekly WWE televised event.   It could have major economic gravity for the Hulkster because many blacks unknown to Hogan were among his fan base that displayed the same blind loyalty to his image as whites and others.  However, his feeble attempt to invoke Booker T’s conduct, I doubt does him little good, as he feebly asserts below.

“Well, Booker T used to do that to me, and every time I pull up YouTube there’s that famous thing with Booker T and his brother is there and they’re all talking trash, and Booker T says, ‘I’m coming for ya Hogan, you ni-er’ — and not ‘ni-a,’ he goes ‘ni-r,’”

Thus, Hogan, or other whites rushing to Hogan’s defense are missing the point by dragging out the use of the word by the other former WWE wrestler Booker T.  who by the way, himself, apologized for using the word.

However, it is another reason that blacks of Booker-Ts generation should not have found favor in the use of such an historically injurious word in an attempt to make it publicly acceptable.  There still is a feeble attempt generally by Hip Hop artists to argue to make it popular and allegedly inoffensive in its use by blacks , whites, and others.  Its usage in history by whites has quite often been in situations where whites clearly had the physical upper hand and were abusing power to deny federally protected guarantees under the color of authority as officers of the court to assert what they considered a “state’s right” to protect segregation, in public as well as private accommodations.   It was their futile attempt at the time to reaffirm white supremacy, by the use of the billy club, fire hose, guns and police dogs.  Many blacks died at the hands of such people who freely used that extremely vile word, “Nigger”.

It is not the word itself, which simply on its own can have a benign or violent use by blacks using the word,

or whites of the same generation benignly and publicly proclaiming to one another “What’s up, my nigga?”

However, it has a more insidious meaning to a cowardly and pathetic looking white boy with a gun that systematically chooses to walk into a Charleston, South Carolina Christian church during its Wednesday night bible study and gun down a pastor and unarmed mothers and grandmothers who welcomed him with open arms.   He too, felt comfortable referring to blacks by the use of the N-word with his warped sense of reason.

Even Hulk Hogan’s use of the word, was not meant in the benign manner of what Booker T is describing.   It was used to exemplify Hogans vile feelings of rage about blacks in general interacting with one of his family members, and brought out particularly by one intimately interacting with his daughter.   His general feeling, one could conclude is that all blacks were virtually despicable and unworthy of any close interaction with his family, unless it was an “8 foot N-word who played basketball and was worth $100 million dollars“, that is one of the “good people”  for which Hogan speaks that we can only assume he can potentially accept.

In light of the inexplicable events concurring on a regular basis directed towards blacks, being severely beaten, arrested, or killed for no apparently good reason, this latest racially charged rant by Hogan once again simply casts suspicion on the genuine friendship of white folk in general in regard to blacks, as to whether there is something sinister that they all are truly masking.   The apologies are becoming old, whether by foolish national politicians making vile references to blacks or the pop culture icons like Hulk Hogan.  Their apologies for being caught using that vile word they expect we blacks should accept as being sincere.   However, to many of us, it’s just another example of the hypocrisy of a neurotic nation that cannot come to grips with its innate feelings about people of color due to its own sense of white supremacy, a concept that continues to place the nation further and further behind in modern global competitive accomplishment.

Unfortunately, when you are trying to compete against a nation, China, with 5 times this nation’s population, we need all hands on well educated and well prepared on deck, whether white, black, brown, red or yellow who is an American.  However, this perennial covert sense of racism hampers whites from seeing the need to develop the nation’s total potential because by doing so, it would potentially supplant white supremacy.  The latter inherent belief in white supremacy has been for much of the 20th century and now the 21st century a useless principle that sets myopic promoters of the concept in positions of power back even further, and may ultimately become the catalyst to not only displace our nation from the forefront of global economic and scientific strength, but totally doom the nation to failure.

THE THIRD EYE IS WATCHING in the case of Sophia Stewart and OJ Simpson

THE REAL ……..AMERICAN CRIME STORY!!!

It’s gone from the single photo of OJ above to the next joint photo above to prepare Americans to enter a war in Afghanistan and Iraq, 14 years ago.  Now its come to being this madness below involving Cuba Gooding, Jr. playing a buffoonish role of Simpson in American Crime Story.

   

The true O.J. Simpson case contains the most insidious level of police corruption possibly in the history of this country, repeatedly involving the suppression of crucial evidence concealed under the color of authority.   Instead of using his stature to demand that the whole truth be revealed involving the Simpson cover up, we have Gooding, once again, willing to be a flunky,  resembling the contemporary Jim Crow caricature, distorting the truth of this infamous sordid case even more so by running around a Bronco in his underwear wielding a .357 magnum.  Cuba always appears ready to receive that call to play any type of simpleton that producers invent, which he does again in this creepy worthless and erroneous narrative.  It is allegedly based on Jeffrey Toobin’s book which is another farce and piece of fiction masquerading as truth.  However, when an actor like Gooding has the chance to say no to buffoonery regarding a serious matter, they should not refuse to do so.  When failing to speak out, there is no need to later wonder about the metamorphosis of black men sending a subliminal message to others allowing them to become reduced to clownish caricatures, and treated inhuman, by those acting under the color of authority; where their lives become expendable, time and time again.  This is what the lies promulgated in the Simpson case has contributed, and now Cuba Gooding’s tomfoolery in this production simply exacerbates that same problem.  It’s bad enough that the producers have allegedly raised several million dollars to make this cable series regarding the Simpson case.  In the meantime, the real truth carriers, i.e. T.H. Johnson, Stephen Singular, the late Joe Bosco, and Dr. H.S. Johnson struggle to have their investigative truths revealed.    Yet, to the extent that it has the potential of harming people, young black men in particular, Gooding and other black actors should pause to ask demanding questions regarding the veracity of so called historical productions as this, and at least not participate in allowing it to become a series of complete buffoonery.

AMMERICAN CASTE SYSTEM: SECRETLY YOU CAN ASPIRE TO BE WHITE; BUT PUBLICLY YOU MUST NOT ASPIRE TO BE BLACK

When was the last time a black person, man or woman, became so upset about another African American choosing to pass for white that it was worthy of a significant portion of the African American community acting as if it were an outrage?   The Rachel Dolezal revelation of being an alleged white woman raises interesting issues and provides a fascinating look into the 400 year old exercise of “passing”.   Due to all of its perceived benefits it’s usually blacks passing for white.  Many of us, however, know Caucasians that imitate black mannerisms of speech, walk, and dress so well that they often are given honorary status of being black, something they will often privately repeat as if it was a gold medal.  In social settings they’ll jokingly refer to themselves in what one perceives as being a facetious manner of being black, but be dead serious in wanting you to believe it.   However, Rachel’s situation is unique according to news commentators because  she went further than others to publicly proclaim she is black by fraudulently stating so in certain documents.    However, the media appears hard pressed to denigrate Rachel during the time that she played this role and it has been rumored that she was more committed to the general welfare of blacks then some of them were to their own.

You see, we can only talk about Rachel in hypothetical  terms because she has not revealed her background, and we live in a nation where a lot of people have a mixture of cultures in their background, it is unusual for anyone to claim to be pure this or that because after 400 years of miscegenation (mixing) either voluntarily and in many instances during slavery involuntarily, everyone is all mixed up.  As a result of all of that social mixture, the white man in power developed what he and his peers legislated into law as being the “one drop” rule.

Remembering laws long passed that’s all it took, and is still unofficially recognized by people like me, to qualify one as being black it only requires “one drop”.   There have been rumors about others like the late FBI director, J. Edgar Hoover, qualified as being black but yet hid his drop or drops of black blood in order to pass for white.   It should be noted, that if Hoover was black he certainly went out of his way to zealously target, with destructive intent, blacks with more melanin in their complexion than he.  We wonder quite often, as blacks, if this is a sign of self hatred, when we find blacks preoccupied in treating other blacks in such an insidious hateful manner.

.  Hoover long targeted Marcus Garvey for an orchestrated fall from grace using some lecherous method, as far back as 1919.  He wanted to bring the Jamaican Garvey to heel, destroy his dignity and put him in his black place.  He finally managed with the help of others to frame Garvey in 1925 for less than $25 dollar error in judgement concerning a share of stock sold to another black for the Black Star Shipping Line.   Interestingly history notes that Hoover would have destroyed Garvey sooner, if allowed.   However, another more physically recognizable black man had more authority during World War I, than Hoover regarding  National Security intelligence, within the urban areas of the US.    Since the responsibility for national security fell under the US Army, a former retired officer was called back to duty in 1916 during WWI.  Major Walter Loving, was put in charge of domestic intelligence regarding the Negro in urban centers and elsewhere in the U.S.   His less sensationalized intelligence reports, diminished the threat of Garvey’s UNIA movement to U.S. national security.  His reports were better received by his military superiors than the neurotic hyperbolic reports turned in by Hoover.  However, the veteran soldier, Major Loving, would retired again in 1919, and with Garvey’s continued growth and prestige among blacks world wide, he became an international target because of his aspirations for African nationalism that collided with European economic interests on the African continent.  That very fact, supported by official diplomatic protests to the US State Department was enough to turn Hoover loose on Garvey with his unscrupulous ways.   Thus, an innocent man in 1925 would attempted to be disgraced,  economically broken, imprisoned, and finally deported.  This, Hoover considered was putting the Negro in his place, certainly the darker skin blacks.  Yet, again, the question lingers as to who Hoover really was.   Was he black or was he white?

This was six decades before DNA identification.   Hoover would apply the same template of destruction in the name of national security almost 50 years later in 1972 when going out of his way to frame the defense minister of the LA chapter of the Black Panther Party, former Viet Nam veteran, Purple Heart and Bronze Star recipient Elmer “Geronimo” Pratt.   Yes, this probable hidden Negro remained in power for almost 55 years, near or at the helm of America’s most preeminent investigative agency, partly by stealth and gathering clandestine damaging information on all his Presidential superiors.  However, this man Hoover used the most insidious and unlawful conspiratorial tools including perjurers, planted evidence, informers and agent provocateurs in his zeal to convict blacks.  His own counterintelligence program, dubbed  COINTELPRO, was used to arrest, frame, and convict innocent blacks who he deemed to threaten the tranquility of the US while protecting all of its Jim Crow policies of the time.   There has been arguably some change, but the horrendous price blacks still pay often in terms of life threatening petty police encounters, still rightfully causes one to ponder.  As a side light, it would be the celebrated legal advocate, Johnnie Cochran’s, machinations behind closed doors that would help to free Pratt, one of his first clients as a young lawyer, after Pratt spent almost 30 years behind bars.   Upon the release of Nelson Mandela, Elmer “Geronimo” Pratt became recognized as the longest political prisoner held behind bars in the world.

Subsequently, Cochran and Pratt’s lawyer for over 25 years, Stuart Hanlon, would secure Pratt’s freedom in a final appeal.   Cochran would sue the FBI with them ultimately paying Pratt a million dollars for its role in framing him.  The County of Los Angeles was forced to pay Pratt $2.5 million dollars for its participation in this horrendous affair for which Pratt never gave up fighting for his freedom.

What concerns me about this latest matter of passing relative to Rachel Dolezal, it resonates of an implicit caste system, similar to India’s untouchables, many of them Afro-Indians who have been on the subcontinent of India for centuries.  Blacks protesting against Rachel’s selection can implicitly suggest they capitulate to accept this American caste system.  Whereby, allowing white controlled media to imply that someone must be crazy that chooses to emulate or desire to pass for black; yet, you have never witnessed repetitive news coverage of a news station repetitively covering a black person that has chosen to be white.  Even if blacks ran to the station to report on someone they allege to be passing for white, it is doubtful that the news media would cover it, unless that person was in a position vital to the stability of the US government.

What I don’t understand is why there’s a need for Rachel’s parents to go out of their way to involve themselves in a press conference to expose their daughter’s selection; it appears that their actions have done more harm than good.  However, what is most irritating is the number of blacks who have joined them in their own perception of outrage.  Yes, many blacks appear to be outraged that Rachel has found something honorable to admire within their black race as African Americans in the U.S. to want to be identified as being one of them, and work on their behalf.  For many blacks her actions were completely absurd and now they are willing to sacrifice a loyal soldier for justice to appease some abstract sense of entitlement that is exclusively theirs and no one else’s.  My feeling is that by questioning Rachel’s motives for wanting to be black, they are simply buying in to the American caste system that induces them to engage in their own self hatred.  The implication of their non-verbal statement is that “Rachel’s crazy because the world knows, as I, that no one wants to be a black American”.  I think we need to rethink this matter and ask why, Rachel cannot be accepted as a black person if she chooses to be that, and I will bet you that based upon certain physical characteristics of Rachel that in spite of what her mother says, there is some black blood somewhere down the line, and remember, “only one drop” makes you black in this racially neurotic country.

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!